Draft Maps

Interactive Map Viewer  (This link takes you to a website where you can view all of the maps and zoom in and out to see the map details.)

November 7th update: Eight Council-requested revised versions of maps 116 and 128

Note: the “Focus Maps” identified by the Council on October 3rd, including the original maps 116 and 128, remain under consideration along with these new maps.

Map 116bPDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts  

(Moves eastern sliver from D4 to D3, then rotates areas to balance populations)

Map 116c PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts 

(Keeps all of “Lake 2” in one District (D4) and adjusts the other districts to balance populations)

Map 116dPDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts 

(116b adjusted to have as close to zero population deviation as possible)

Map 116e – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts 

(Alternative approach to 116b that also moves the eastern sliver from D4 to D3, but then balanced populations in an alternative manner)

Map 128bPDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts   

(Revision of 128 that balances D5 by taking out area east of Ridge Route Dr, instead of the area west of Ridge Route Dr, and population balances by moving the neighborhood adjacent to El Toro Memorial Park from D3 to D2)

Map 128cPDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts

(128/128b adjusted to have as close to zero population deviation as possible)

Map 128dPDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts

(A similar idea to 128 — with districts extending the length of the city as much as possible to blend communities across Council districts — but with the south also divided)

Map 129PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts

(128 revised to extend all four length-of-the-city districts to the northeast end of the city, including having two Council districts representing portions of Portola Hills)

Election Sequencing Report for October 3rd Focus maps and new maps requested November 7th.
Summary of Key Statistics for all maps through the new maps requested November 7th.
Compactness Scores for maps 115, 116 and the new maps.

October 3rd update: Council Narrows the Focus to Five Maps

At their October 3rd meeting, the City Council unanimously decided to narrow the list of maps down to five maps: the existing maps 109, 110, 115 and 116, and a new map, labeled map number 128.

You can review these maps on the interactive viewer, or print out maps and demographic profiles from the following links:

Map 109PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 110PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 115PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 116PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 128 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts

What do you think of the Draft Maps?
Now that they are posted, the Council wants to hear what you like and dislike about each map.

The Council wants to know not just which map(s) you like or dislike, but why you feel that way about each map. These are the first drafts, not necessarily the final maps, and future versions can include revisions aimed at addressing the concerns raised by residents.

Please take the time to look at them and share your thoughts, either by email to LakeForest@NDCresearch.com, by letter, at a Council meeting, or using the contact form.

And, as a reminder, you can still draw your own revisions to any of the posted Draft Maps. See the “Draw a Map” page for instructions and data to do so.

=== All of the Pre-October 3 Meeting Draft Maps ====

This viewer is an easy-to-use way to review and compare maps, as it allows you to zoom in and out on the map details and to change the base map from streets to satellite view or topographical maps. It also allows you to add overlays for Population Unit borders and labels (from the “Draw a Map” page kits) and for Homeowner Association boundaries. But it does not allow you to create or edit a map.

Summary reports on the draft maps from the City’s demographic consultant:

1. Comments provided by the members of the public to accompany their map proposals
2. Election year sequencing options for each map (does not include maps requested November 7th)
3. Summary of key statistics for each map (does not include maps requested November 7th)

Note: some of the maps submitted by residents have been slightly modified by NDC to ensure contiguity of the districts and to assign any territory that was inadvertently unassigned. As a result, the demographic numbers may differ slightly from the original submission.

Full City, Population Balanced, Maps

Map 103 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 105 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 106 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 108 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 109 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 110 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 111 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 112 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 114 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 115 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 116 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 127 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts

Single-District Maps

Map 107 – PDF map 
Map 123 – PDF map
Map 124 – PDF map
Map 125 – PDF map 

Full City Maps that are almost within the 10% Population Balance limit, but not quite

Map 101 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 121 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 122 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts

Full City Maps that are not Population Balanced

Map 102 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 104 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 113 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 118 (Proposes 4 districts with an at-large Mayor)  – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 119 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 120 – PDF mapPDF demographic profile of proposed districts
Map 126 (Proposed dividing city into 3 districts) – PDF map